Tuesday, December 2, 2025

Election Commission Dismisses Rahul Gandhi’s Charge of Online Voter Deletion

Share

New Delhi, September 19, 2025: The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Friday rejected allegations made by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi that votes can be deleted online. The poll body clarified that names on the electoral roll cannot be removed through the internet by any individual and that every deletion follows a strict legal process.

What the Commission Said

In its detailed clarification, the ECI stated that:

  • No citizen has the power to erase a name from the voter list online.
  • Voters may use Form 7 to request the removal of an entry from the roll, but submitting this form does not automatically strike off the name.
  • According to the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, a person’s name can only be deleted after the concerned voter is notified and given a chance to respond.

The Commission emphasized that these safeguards ensure the integrity of the electoral roll and prevent wrongful deletions.

Case of Aland, Karnataka

The clarification came in the backdrop of an incident in Aland, Karnataka, where a large number of deletion requests were submitted ahead of the 2023 state elections.

  • A total of 6,018 Form 7 applications were received online.
  • After verification, only 24 were genuine, while 5,994 applications were rejected as invalid.
  • Due to the suspicious nature of the submissions, an inquiry was initiated.
  • Following the probe, an FIR (No. 26/2023, Aland Police Station, dated February 21, 2023) was lodged by the Electoral Registration Officer.

The Commission highlighted this case to underline that improper applications are not accepted and that action is taken against suspicious activity.

Rahul Gandhi’s Allegations

Earlier, Rahul Gandhi had reiterated his charge of “vote chori,” claiming that the Commission was shielding those responsible for deleting opposition votes. He alleged that a software-driven mechanism was being used to selectively remove the names of Dalits, OBCs, Adivasis, minorities, and other groups traditionally aligned with opposition parties.

During a press briefing, Gandhi presented the Aland data as evidence and insisted that he possessed “100% proof” of manipulation. He pointed out that the irregularities came to light only when a booth-level officer discovered her uncle’s vote missing and, upon checking further, found her neighbour’s vote deleted as well.

He also accused Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar of protecting what he called “vote thieves.”

Commission’s Position

Reiterating its stance, the ECI maintained that every addition or deletion in the voter roll follows due procedure, and the Aland incident itself showed that false applications are rejected and suspicious cases investigated. It insisted that no unlawful deletion of votes had taken place.

The Indian Bugle
The Indian Buglehttps://theindianbugle.com
A team of seasoned experts dedicated to journalistic integrity. Committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news, they navigate complexities with precision. Trust them for insightful, reliable reporting in the dynamic landscape of Indian and global news.

Trending Now

Viral

Recommended