The Turkman Gate violence did not erupt overnight. What began as a routine anti-encroachment drive soon turned into a flashpoint of unrest. Delhi Police now believe that social media mobilisation, false rumours and local influence combined to push the situation out of control. This article explains what happened, who is under the scanner and why the case matters beyond Old Delhi.
What Happened at Turkman Gate
On Wednesday morning, Delhi Police reached the Turkman Gate area to carry out an anti-encroachment drive. The operation aimed to clear illegal structures and ensure smooth movement in the congested locality. Soon after the drive began, a crowd started gathering. Within a short span, stones were hurled at the police team. Several officers suffered injuries, forcing police to use force to disperse the crowd and restore order.
How Rumours Triggered Panic
Investigators believe that rumours spread rapidly during the operation. Messages circulated claiming that a mosque was being demolished. This claim was false, but it created fear and anger. As a result, people rushed to the spot without verifying facts. Police say this misinformation acted as the immediate trigger for violence.
Role of Social Media and Online Calls
The probe has revealed that social media played a decisive role. Police are tracking YouTuber Salman, who allegedly used online platforms to ask people to gather at Turkman Gate. According to investigators, these calls reached a wide audience within minutes. As more people arrived, tempers flared and the crowd became difficult to control.
Police have also identified the use of WhatsApp groups to mobilise locals. Influential individuals from the area allegedly encouraged people to assemble and resist police action. These groups helped spread rumours, amplify anger and coordinate movement on the ground. Authorities believe this was not a random reaction but a planned attempt to disturb public peace.
Why YouTuber Salman Is Central to the Case
YouTuber Salman stands at the centre of the investigation because of his alleged role in digital mobilisation. Police teams are using technical analysis, call records and witness statements to trace him. Raids are underway at multiple locations. Officials say the case will establish whether online influence crossed the line from reporting into provocation.
Digital Evidence Under Close Watch
Investigators are relying heavily on digital evidence. They are scanning:
- Social media posts and livestreams
- Viral video clips
- WhatsApp message trails
- CCTV footage from nearby streets
This data helps police reconstruct the sequence of events and identify who incited the crowd and how violence spread so quickly.
The case has also taken a political turn. Police sources say that Mohibullah Nadvi was present in the area before the violence began. Officers had reportedly requested him to leave, but he stayed on. Police may question him to understand his role and presence during the critical period.
Arrests and Ongoing Action
So far, police have identified around 30 people allegedly linked to the violence. Arrests have started, and search operations continue. Officials have made it clear that influence or status will not shield anyone from legal action.
During the clashes, five police personnel sustained injuries. Authorities say they used force only after the situation slipped beyond control. Their immediate goal remained crowd dispersal and prevention of further damage or loss of life.
The Turkman Gate incident highlights a larger issue. In today’s digital age, rumours and online calls can mobilise crowds faster than authorities can respond. The case raises serious questions about:
- Responsibility of content creators
- Limits of digital activism
- Use of social media during sensitive operations
- Accountability for spreading unverified claims
Delhi Police will continue analysing evidence and questioning those involved. The outcome of this case may set an example for how law enforcement deals with social media-driven unrest in the future.
Conclusion
The Turkman Gate violence was not just a law-and-order issue. It was a warning. When misinformation meets digital reach and local influence, even routine civic actions can spiral into chaos. As the investigation deepens, the focus remains on accountability, truth and preventing a repeat of such incidents in the heart of the capital.
